LOL, BS!! You don-t even have a real IND account! Troll harder, bro.
I-ve got like a 1,000,000 asks saying stuff like this, but I posted yours because you-re the first 2 pretend 2 be an actual IND so far. So for every1 let me clarify this now:
I can-t be monitored or punished for =blasphemy.= Blaspheming against ANY religion isn-t illegal. All I-m doing is trying 2 bring 2 light some historical facts & religious documents that are in the public domain but that aren-t common knowledge. I-m not doing anything illegal. I checked.
You can-t even argue that blaspheming specifically against Jegus could be interpreted as slander against the Advisier. I checked that 2, & found this news quote from almost 1 sweep ago:
MA: So, do you have any plans of taking the Church’s recommendation to add “slander or libel against an Imperious’s ancestor” to the list of crimes which count as verbal treason?
KV: OH HELL FUCKING NO.
MA: You seem pretty firm on this.
KV: YOU THINK?
MA: Would you like to share why?
KV: FUCKING DELIGHTED TO. FIRST OFF, IF I WERE TO DO THAT, IT WOULD BE PRETTY FUCKING BLATANTLY INTENDED TO PREVENT PEOPLE FROM BADMOUTHING HIM [Jegus Kryst], SINCE IT’S NOT LIKE THERE ARE ANY OTHER IMPERIOI RUNNING AROUND WITH BIG-SHOT ANCESTORS THAT PEOPLE WANT TO TAKE POTSHOTS AT. SO IF I CHANGED THE LAW LIKE THAT, THERE’S PRETTY MUCH NO WAY THAT WOULDN’T BE MIXING RELIGION AND POLITICS. AN IDEA WHICH IS, ON THE ONE HAND, ILLEGAL, AND ON THE OTHER HAND, RETARDED.
SECOND, WHY THE FUCK DO I CARE IF ANYBODY DISSES HIM? HE ISN’T ONE OF THE CURRENT IMPERIOI. HE PREDATES RECUPERACOONS, FOR FUCK’S SAKE. HIS REPUTATION HAS ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING WHATSOEVER ON CURRENT POLITICS.
AND THIRD, WHAT THE HELL WOULD “SLANDER AND LIBEL” BE DEFINED AS FOR SOMEBODY WE DON’T ACTUALLY KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT? AND A RELIGIOUS FIGURE, NO LESS? TO A BELIEVER, SAYING “HE ACTUALLY DID HIS DUTY TO THE DRONES LIKE EVERYONE ELSE” INSULTS HIS CHASTITY; TO A NON-BELIEVER, SAYING “HE DIED A VIRGIN” INSULTS HIS ROMANTIC COMPETENCY. TRYING TO DEFINE “SLANDER AND LIBEL” FOR HIM WOULD NECESSITATE LEGALLY DEFINING HIM AS EITHER MORTAL OR DIVINE, WHICH WOULD BE THE GOVERNMENT TRYING TO DECLARE WHAT’S TRUE ABOUT RELIGION. WHICH IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT’S FUCKING JOB.
MA: What do you say to claims that the Sufferer’s reputation could reflect back on you?
KV: I SAY THAT ANYBODY WHO HONESTLY EXPECTS ME TO RAISE THE DEAD BY RAPPING AT A CORPSE IS GOING TO BE UNBELIEVABLY DISAPPOINTED. WHAT HE WAS REPUTED TO BE LIKE AND DO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I’M LIKE AND WHAT I DO.
MA: Be that as it may, there are many trolls who associate you with Him anyway. In their case, they would understand any slander against the Sufferer as slander against you. What concerns do you have about slander against your ancestor that reaches this audience?
KV: NONE. IT’S THEIR PROBLEM, NOT MINE. IF THEY DON’T HAVE THE MINIMAL COMMON SENSE NEEDED TO COMPREHEND THAT A TROLL WHO DIED A MILLION FUCKING SWEEPS AGO IS A DIFFERENT TROLL FROM ONE HATCHED TEN SWEEPS AGO, THEN THEY DON’T HAVE THE MINIMAL COMMON SENSE NEEDED TO BE A THREAT.
MA: The Church can’t be pleased by your stance.
KV: AGAIN, THEIR PROBLEM, NOT MINE. EVERYONE’S FREE TO KEEP ON SAYING WHATEVER THE FUCK THEY WANT ABOUT HIM.
MA: “Him” meaning the Sufferer?
KV: WHO ELSE, TROLL WILL SMITH? BUT I FUCKING SWEAR TO GOG, THE NEXT PERSON TO SEND ME PORN OF HIM IS GETTING THEIR HANDS CUT OFF.”
MA: “Of him” meaning “of the Sufferer” or “of Troll Will Smith”?
KV: ARE YOU STUPID? TELL ME YOU’RE NOT THIS STUPID. I MEANT THE FIRST ONE.
MA: Is there that much porn of Him floating around?
KV: IS THAT A SERIOUS QUESTION?
MA: Of course.
KV: I’M SORRY. MY BAD. I DIDN’T REALIZE YOU’VE NEVER BEEN ON THE FUCKING INTERNET BEFORE.
As a side note, Advisier Vantas is the only contemporary troll I-ve ever seen use the word =gog,= although I-ve seen him use =god= too. =Gog= has a really weird etymology, I-ll cover it sometime.
Anyway, that covers that. This blog is totally legal. =) The Advisier & Replicus himself says so.